More careful planning and use of resources
There are a number of reasons why Amundsen was successful. Among these was his sole purpose to reach the pole, knowledge of Inuit technology, planning, attention to detail, and good luck . Amundsen discovered the Axel Heiberg Glacier and it proved to be a shorter route up to the Polar Plateau than the Beardmore Glacier. The Beardmore had been discovered by Shackleton three years previously and was used by Scott. Without the good luck of finding this new, shorter route, Amundsen's careful planning and attention to detail would have been fruitless. Though some have said the Heiberg Glacier is an "easier" route, it is merely shorter. It has been described by explorers as a tumult, a "catastrophe of ice." Pilots flying over the region prefer the long slope of the Beardmore to the Heiberg, for which they must use their maximum rate of climb to overcome. Another factor contributing to Amundsen's success was his use of dogs for transport since these allowed him to head south some three weeks earlier in the Antarctic summer season than Scott who used dogs and Manchurian ponies. Amundsen used
Samoyed dogs to haul his sledges. After reaching the Polar Plateau, over half of the dogs were killed and fed to the remaining dogs, reducing the weight of dog food required for the entire trip.
Scott kept an open mind on his transport options, using dogs, tractors (which broke down about 50 miles from base camp), and
Manchurian ponies man-hauling with skis and man-hauling on foot. It is true they lacked the specialist knowledge of handling dogs in the manner of Amundsen but it is untrue that Scott did not use sled-dogs nor that he did not use skis effectively. Norwegian expert skier Lieutenant Tryggve Gran, RNN, accompanied Scott on Nansen's advice. Gran later commented that Scott's skiing ability matched that of the average Norwegian. Scott's polar party relied primarily on "man hauling" which meant using only their own power to pull their sledges, which, in Scott's experience, was the most effective. Of Scott's final polar team of five men four were on skis, the fifth was not simply because, initially, it was not intended that five men go to the pole so his skis had earlier been stowed on a dog sled, that had returned to base, to save overall weight. As Scott's party neared the exit from the top of the Beardmore glacier there was a phased withdrawal of the dog team, and killing of their ponies for food. The dog team headed back to base with the intention of later heading south again to meet and help the returning polar party at some point in the future.
Scott calculated the supply requirements based on a number of expeditions, both by members of his team and by those of Shackleton, on this basis Scott's planning was more than adequate to his needs. The shortage of food and fuel that eventually killed Scott's team was due to the unexpected prolonged and exceptionally severe weather and the injuries of members of the team slowing their progress and a leakage of fuel from the cans stored in the depots. Amundsen did not experience this fuel loss due to his practice of soldering the fuel tins until they were to be used. Scott used fuel storage vessels with leather washers, a method which had previously been used with some success by a number of previous expeditions. As it was, in Scott's case evaporation of fuel occurred at random from the storage vessels he used although it seems to have occurred more so with the storage vessels he used further south.
On their return to the Ross Ice Shelf, Scott's group experienced prolonged blizzards and low temperatures which have only been matched in one year since continuous records began to be kept in 1985
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/96/23/13012. Scott and Shackleton's experience in 1903 and 1907 gave them first-hand experience of
normal conditions in Antarctica. Simpson, Scott's meteorologist 1910-1912, did a huge amount of research into the weather during the time of their expedition, often taking two readings a day, every day. None of these suggested the extreme weather conditions they encountered on their return journey and a severe blizzard cemented the fate of the Scott team. The exceptional severity of the weather meant that they could not leave the confines of their tent and thus they were prevented from reaching the final food and fuel depot. In the previous year, at the time they were laying their food and fuel depots, weather conditions frustrated them and they had to place their One-Ton Depot at 79° 29', 36 statute miles short of its planned location at 80°. Scott perished 11 statute miles from One-Ton Depot.
Much has been said that Scott was inappropriately dressed in the man-made fibred clothing that he chose and that Amundsen was better prepared in wearing furs (as was the Inuit practice of Amundsen's experience). The fact is that each was best dressed for their circumstances. Amundsen used dog-sleds and as such his team generated much less body heat and perspiration and needed the superb insulation of fur clothing. Scott's team, who exclusively man-hauled on the high polar plateau as expected, sweated much more profusely and needed clothing that would allow the evaporation of that perspiration. If Scott had worn furs the subsequent freezing of that perspiration close to the skin would have been disastrous.
Both Amundsen's and Scott's teams suffered because of
normal [severe] conditions in the Antarctic. It has been argued that sheer bad luck caused Scott and his team to perish, though it will never be known if Scott's team would have survived under
normal Antarctic conditions. It has also been argued that the superior preparation and planning of Amundsen's team would have allowed them to survive the unforeseen weather encountered by Scott.